According to S
teen’s broad, tripudiary, grandi
ose ideal, Hetairotopia is concentrically ar
rayed in “spool-vitrines” wherein the hyle-sh
riven parlous témé
nolâtre, impure sva
romant, repulsive pa
rvulaster, open-minded plurifo
rm plesionaut, vernac
ular VIP, or entesmal whatwhosit may relish
spiral overt enumerations of “Tezcatl
ipocinate constellations” of cons
orts participating in immode
st “love-rites” paradigmatic of the zigg
urat’s promiscuous
opticality.
[
...]
Our story hereina
fter forks: Hetairotopian science d
ivides on oral-typolog
ical potentialities of eviden
ce into a conspiratorial pevets-sekta which les Frères C
abet spun tired orphan Do
rieda into polysvadhāvinvarastically on the one hand, and, on the other, a more transp
arent, voire plus miè
vre plenum à trois having a more pornocr
atic scope in ontogeny as well as ontology.
As most priručnici on the subject dismiss the latter simply a
s a most prurient deviation of the former, it is — even though both polymeretri
cian “tines” cooperate in their historical mission of pumping the wells of the
past to irrigate the fields of the future — to the
latter’s Savoir épanoui we turn.
[
...]