1. Steen’s Harem
  2. Iteiči (射手市)
  3. Works Consulted

2. Iteiči (射手市)

Our story hereinafter forks: Hetairotopian science divides on oral-typological potentialities of evidence into a conspiratorial pevets-sekta1 which les Frères Cabet spun tired orphan Dorieda into polysvadhāvinvarastically2 on the one hand, and, on the other, a more transparent, voire plus mvre plenum à trois having a more pornocratic scope in ontogeny as well as ontology. As most priručnici3 on the subject dismiss the latter simply as a most prurient deviation of the former, it is — even though both polymeretrician “tines” cooperate in their historical mission of pumping the wells of the past to irrigate the fields of the future — to the latter’s Savoir épanoui we turn.4

Now, while it is only poveri adolescenti poco inappuntabili who remain unaware that, as a sort of climax to Siefker, Krefft, and von Brockdorff’s trek, Hetairotopia returns, debauched and bedraggled as if from some ancient ancipital complot, Dionysia Révolue, as it were, to the modern esprit-butant in the form of the κωμαστήριον vel πυριατήριον where our Icaro-Fourierist travelers apostrophized to the visiting South Texican section, openly, for the nonce, challenging them to an impromptu concert, a sportive symposium — starring Corilla, febril et torve, as Aspasia Inmóvil; pour Mnesarete, propice Consantia; and for Neaira, topless vertiginous Ursula — yet it is those same разночинцый poveri adolescenti, in opaco modo certo, who are very much aware of what exactly such a heterochronic conation specifically implies.5

For it was only after the local “tipi-dwelling tricksters came out in conjoint troupes — berdaches, batée, rotund spirits, travelos, ἔπρᾱξᾰ́μενα de toutes sortes — to play diversionarily with our ecdysiast ebriate round pantophorically” that, by joining in with this, as our authors called it,6 “Gesamtgeschlechtstkunstwerks Treff,” Hetairotopia’s nervule mravní (moral estuprement) began to take on the form we know it by today, viz., with each amorous native remplaçant l’un l’autre in a very diverse norial tumpline to strip randy floaty inspired overjoyed champion travelers unrestrainedly (O, pivotages déshabilleurs d’antan!) of their clothes and vice-versa, it became readily apparent to all and sundry, for instance, that the yoni-concept is as active a participant, once so-called ancestors’ past “revelations” are laid aside, in the orectic pasión ondulatoria of penis-action (cooperating in the latter’s savoir épanouissant as much as its own), as the penis-orality dovetail is to yoni-depravity such that, e.g., your oral passive “‘tertium quid non est, sed necessarium πρόσταγμα ἔρωτος’ (Pliny, IV, De artibus ponderetis amoris, Leuven, Prtd Privat’ly, Ooienstraat, 1601).”7

  1. Our ongoing researches (to be published separately) in “Los Archivos Cabet y Dorieda” in Beulah have revealed that the Icaro-Fourierists Nehorići and Eirinehonići Cabet in conjunction with Beulah native Corilla “Lola” Dorieda founded their Hypocionian ‘sect of singers’ (pevets-sekta [певец-секта]) based in part on principles summarized in the following Baconian spectio consortionis: “Men have entertained a conceit that shewith prettily, namely, That if you graft a Late-coming-Fruit, upon a Stock of a Fruit-tree that cometh early, the Graft will bear Fruit early, as a Peach upon a Cherry : And contrariwise, if an Early-coming-Fruit upon a Stock of a Fruit-tree that cometh late, the Graft will bear Fruit late ; as a Cherry upon a Peach. But these are but imaginations, and untrue. The cause is, for that the Cions over-ruleth the Stock quite, and the Stock is but Passive onely, and giveth Aliment, but no Motion to the Graft” (Bacon 1670: Century V, Experiments in Consort, touching the Putting back or Retardation of Germination, § 421.)
  2. Although, technically, polysvadhāvinvarastically (from svadhāvinvara स्वधाविन्वर) means ‘of the manner in which a maiden, choosing from among a host of suitors, freely chooses several’, the Cabet Brothers had the annoying habit of hogging her all for themselves.
  3. In addition to the aforesaid priručnici (приручници, ‘textbooks’), more popular works are available.
  4. Siefker, Krefft, & von Brockdorff (1843).
  5. Being South Texican, naturally, Graeco-Slavonian terms such as κωμαστήριον (comastérion) ‘saturnalium’; πυριατήριον (puriatérion) ‘sudatorium’; and raznočintsïy (разночинцый) ‘motley’, came as readily on our trio’s tongues as to their nibs, and vice-versa.
  6. Wishing to keep a true record of the épanouissement their savoir underwent from initial contact to the the first Karre of Pfefferstork Hetairotopians drily eviscerated to celebrate their coming together, our trio of authors deemed it obligatory to not white-wash the potentially derogatory coin they couched their first impressions in, hence the inclusion of such blinkered terms in the account they published long after they had been thoroughly integrated into the unique plurality of peoples and traditions quintessential to the culturally diverse Beulah the world has, until recently, known; ἔπρᾱξᾰ́μενα (eprāxámena) may be glossed as ‘transpassivists’ (Siefker, Krefft, & von Brockdorff 1843: Introduction).
  7. Plinius Secundus (1601); cited in Siefker, Krefft, & von Brockdorff (1843: Introduction), where πρόσταγμα ἔρωτος (próstagma érōtos) could be construed as something like ‘prescription of love’.
Creative Commons License A not-for-profit instantiation of human imagination and human labor • A sociophysiological fabulation • Copyright © 2021